MFOS SoundLab MiniSynth in SMT

Ray Wilson was the guy behind Music From Outer Space. He was a huge contributor to the Synth DIY scene. He designed a lot of cool projects, offered kits, schematics and a huge amount of tips and tricks for beginners. He even wrote a book on how to build an Analog Synth. MFOS kits and PCBs are still available through various resellers (see synthcube).

Eurorack MFOS SLMS clone

I built, several years ago, a MFOS SoundLab MiniSynth. It’s a cool little analog synth, dedicated to beginners (with some technical backgrounds). It features 2 oscillators (Voltage Controlled), one white noise generator, one LFO, one AD generator, one LP/HP VCF and one VCA. It’s completely normalized and the routing is done by switches.

Even if it’s designed for simplicity, the panel wiring is a difficult step. In fact, MFOS projects are renowned for the amount of wiring required behind the panel, connecting pots and jacks to the PCB. And it can become a total mess quickly.
The second problem, if you’re into Eurorack format, is the size of the PCBs. They are pretty huge and hardly fit behind a 3U panel. Eventually, they’re attached at 90° from the panel using custom made brackets (or with Ray’s clever mounting brackets), making your modules really deep in your case.

So, as I wanted a second SoundLab Mini Synth to play with, but wasn’t really happy wiring again the same mess, I decided to make my own version of the PCB.

I took the original Schematics, edited everything in my favorite Electronic CAD KiCad and created a PCB, using almost only Surface Mount Devices.
Everything now takes place on a single PCB. And no wiring is required anymore.

The downside of a “no wire” project is obviously, when the PCB is finished, the lack of flexibility in user interface component placement. If you make a mistake in the design, placing a potentiometer in wrong position, too close to another pot or a switch in wrong direction, it’s difficult to correct it and you end up designing a new PCB.

So, designing an ergonomic, well thought user interface is a very important step. It’s the first step.

Front panel design

The position of the controls is different from Ray’s. It’s an arrangement I experimented on my previous build and gives me great satisfaction.

Front Panel Express engraved, black anodized, 2mm aluminum

I use Front Panel Designer (by Schaeffer / Front Panel Express) for the job.
I then export the design to dxf and import it as a footprint in Kicad. It allows to accurately align UI PCB components to the front panel.
Then I check how much space everything take, measure how much space is left for other components.

For my SLMS version, I tried a 2 PCB solution, using board to board connectors, as I did previously in some projects (my DS8 clone for example).
I iterated the process several times, figuring which layout was the best compromise between space, usability, cost (big PCBs are expensive), components I could use, etc.

KiCad pcbnew and schematic capture

I ended with a one PCB solution, and everything in SMT, except for expo converter transistors, switches, pots and jacks, plus a couple miscellanies.

SMT was not my first choice. I wanted a TH solution because I had several components already in stock from my previous SLMS build. But, comparing the price of a bunch of resistors and the price of a second PCB, you can guess easily which solution is the least expensive.

Top side

I made, I think, a not-so-bad PCB of Ray’s classic synth. (Some errors were introduced though. See below.)

As Ray never put is work under Open Source or Open Hardware license, I can’t publish my SMT/Eurorack version in Open Source too. I only publish it as a non-profit/personal use only, as Ray did with its projects.

License clarification, as found on Ray’s website:

Everything on Music From Outer Space is free for non-commercial use.

Please feel free to use the information presented on the MFOS website to the fullest extent for non-commercial uses. You can make your own PCBs from the layouts and drawings we provide or design your own if you prefer. We appreciate a link to us if you blog or YouTube your work.

Build instructions

Now, if you want to build one for yourself, you need to know that I introduced, during the design process, several mistakes. I’m actually glad they were pretty obvious, easy to spot and to fix.

Gate Input

AR Gate/Trig input

I spotted the first mistake while I was fulfilling the BOM and just after the Gerber files were sent to the PCB fab house. I used, in schematic capture, the wrong symbol for Q8. Instead of using a BC847, I used the symbol for a BC547. The pins are in a different order: BC547 is CBE (pin 1 is C, pin 2 is B and pin 3 is E). While BC847 is BEC.

So, for your build, don’t use a SOT package. Just use a TH TO92 BC547 for Q8 and solder it as on the picture below. It’s relatively easy to fix.

Q8 (BC547)

I must confess, the soldering job is not pretty on this one. I did it several times before figuring what the solution was.

The second mistake (actually, twice the same) is the inversion of pin 1 and 3 on Attack and Release pots.
To fix this one, you need to cut the PCB traces and rewire things correctly. Ok, I said it was wire-free… My bad.
If you don’t fix it, the controls are reversed.

Follow this scheme: cut traces where red marks, wire links as orange drawings.

Cut red marks, link orange traces

Use cut legs for short junctions

Solder a wire as on the picture below:

Fixing Attack and Release control inversion


Another mistake is, again, the inversion of 2 pins, but this time on the VCO2 Ramp/Rect selection switch. Again, the solution is to cut two PCB traces and rewire correctly.
Actually, this inversion is not really problematic, unless you use the Front Panel design I created. If you want, you can simply exchange the “Ramp” and “Rect” labels.

Noise Gen

No problem here. The trick is to select the right transistor for the job. I have good results with the old noisy 2N1711 but a BC547 is a good option too. The amplification coefficient is so huge that, basically, any transistor is fine.


LFO is straight forward.


VCF has no problem either.


The biggest mistake I introduced is an interesting lesson.
It took me some time before I discovered what the error was. In fact, when I first powered my SLMS, I had absolutely no response, and worst, I had a short on the negative rail. Fortunately, the 79L09 did a very good job as its over-current protection fired instantly.

It wasn’t so simple to find the shortcut origin because, without power, there’s no sign of any short: using an ohmmeter was of no help. Then, if there’s no resistive short, it was obviously coming from one of the active components, with some weird action. Maybe a bad component? How to test when everything is soldered? It’s easier when you have socket mounted ICs. But here… how to figure what’s causing the short?

Well, two methods. The first one is to let the current flow and check who is heating too much, either with your fingers, or with a sensitive temp sensor. A thermal camera is the perfect tool for the job, but I don’t have one.

The second method is to use the resistivity of copper traces. Simply measure the voltage drops along the collapsing rail PCB traces. The lowest voltage measurement between the rail and your reference voltage (“gnd”) is closest to the shortcut. Same thing, the highest voltage measurement between power entry point and rail trace is the closest to the shortcut.
This method requires high shorcut current (copper resistivity is low) and requires a precision voltmeter.
In my case, temperature check was sufficient to find the chip causing the short.

I thought it would be a good idea to tie the “Amp bias input” pin of the unused halve of the LM13700 down to ground, in order to “reduce” things such as noise and power consumption…
I’d rather tied it down to negative rail!
In fact, letting Iabc pin floating is fine… as Ray did!

Never connect Iabc pin to ground!

Long story short, to avoid trouble, do not solder U3 pin 1. Cut it or lift it:

Lift U3 pin 1 to avoid negative rail collapsing


Jack connectors

Last “mistake”, I used the Erthenvar Jack footprints for the 4 Jack connectors. Those Jacks connectors are fine. In fact, I use them often. But I misjudged their height, compared to other control components, pots and switches. “Erthenvar Jacks” (WQP-PJ301BM is 11.5mm height, where other components are 10mm height.
The right alternative is WQP-PJ398SM. To use them instead, you need to bend the ground pin and add a bit of wire to join the PCB ground pad.

Use WQP-PJ398SM jack, bend the ground pin and add some wire to join ground pad


For a complete list of components, sorted by values, with refs and comments, see below in downloads section.

Sources for pots and jacks:


11.5 mm height Jacks (PJ301BM):

10 mm height Jacks (PJ398SM / “Thonkicon”):



Top side

Bottom side

Wrong foot print for Jack connectors

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *